Exposure in writing
A memo that names each risk, ranks its severity and prices its realistic range — a document a board can act on and rely on later.
Aun & Co. audits contracts, structures and live tensions for dispute risk, giving Israeli and international clients a written picture of exposure before it hardens.
Dispute Prevention & Management is a litigator's read applied before anything is filed. It is for businesses that sense friction — a drifting partner, a contract with soft edges, a counterparty testing boundaries — and want the exposure named and priced while positions can still be shaped. The firm reviews the documents the way opposing counsel would, then delivers a written opinion: where the risk sits, what it is worth, and what to fix now.
The method is adversarial by design. Every document is read as an exhibit: what would the other side underline, what admission sits in your own emails, which clause fails under the pressure of an actual hearing. Findings arrive as a memo with a severity ranking and concrete fixes — amended clauses, records to create, letters to send — not as abstract risk language.
A memo that names each risk, ranks its severity and prices its realistic range — a document a board can act on and rely on later.
Each finding pairs with an action: a clause to amend, a record to create, a notice to send. Prevention is treated as work product, not advice-in-the-air.
Reviews are done by the advocate who would argue the case, so weak points are found the way an opponent would find them.
Evidence and correspondence are shaped months before any claim, when a single well-timed letter can still change the entire posture.
The firm has stress-tested venture agreements for exit, valuation and deadlock mechanics, rewriting the clauses that collapse first when partners fall out.
A written downside assessment across supplier, employment and shareholder fronts, delivered ahead of a generational transfer of management.
Assembling the record — notices, cure periods, admissions — so that the client's first formal letter arrived with a complete evidentiary spine behind it.
Mapping the paralysis scenarios in a two-shareholder structure and building contractual escape mechanisms before relations deteriorated.
Described in abbreviated, anonymised form to preserve client confidentiality.
A structured legal review of contracts, correspondence and corporate records to identify where a future claim could arise, how strong it would be, and what it could cost. The output is a written memo with ranked findings and specific corrective steps.
Before signature, ideally — that is when leverage is highest. But mid-performance reviews matter just as much: most disputes are lost in the correspondence and conduct that accumulate quietly between signing and breach.
Work done with counsel for the purpose of legal advice is generally privileged under Israeli law. The firm structures prevention engagements so the analysis stays protected while the corrective steps become part of your record.
The key contracts, the correspondence around the pressure points, and the corporate documents that frame the relationship. The firm returns a written view of the three largest risks, their realistic cost, and the order in which to address them.