The decision read against its own rule
The refusal is tested against the framework it claims to rest on.
Judicial review and administrative challenges for companies, associations, and international organisations facing a decision by an authority.
An organisation that depends on a permit, a registration, or an approval is exposed the moment an authority refuses one. The refusal is rarely the end of the story: administrative decisions must be lawful, reasoned, proportionate, and even-handed, and a decision that fails those tests can be challenged. The firm acts for organisations - including international ones - against the body that said no.
The firm reads the authority's own decision and the rule it claims to apply, because an administrative refusal is constrained by the very framework it invokes. It looks for the point where the client's situation departs from the blanket the authority is applying - a deviation from a collective refusal can open the individual merits that a blanket position tried to close. It builds the record an administrative court expects: the decision, the criteria, and the gap between them.
The refusal is tested against the framework it claims to rest on.
Where you were swept into a collective refusal, the work is to show why your situation is different.
Representation for international organisations in English, Hebrew, and Arabic.
The firm advises and represents an international organisation challenging a government ministry's refusal to register its operating presence, where the refusal rested on a government decision and published criteria. The engagement opens a review of that decision on its merits.
Described in abbreviated, anonymised form to preserve client confidentiality.
Yes; administrative decisions must be lawful, reasoned, proportionate, and even-handed, and a decision that fails these standards can be challenged by petition to an administrative court or, in the right matters, the High Court of Justice.
The main grounds are that the decision was unlawful, unreasonable, disproportionate, made without proper process, or applied unequally; the specific gap between the decision and its own stated criteria is usually the lever.
Administrative challenges are time-sensitive and delay itself can defeat a petition, so the decision and its reasons should be assessed quickly after they are received.